<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short Book Review: The Yiddish Policemen&#8217;s Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/</link>
	<description>by Jane Austen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doombot &#187; Shit. Yes.</title>
		<link>http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/comment-page-1/#comment-50704</link>
		<dc:creator>doombot &#187; Shit. Yes.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/#comment-50704</guid>
		<description>[...] to Variety, Michael Chabon&#8217;s The Yiddish Policemen Union (which I read a few months back) is being made into a movie by none other than the Coen brothers (whose latest movie, No Country [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Variety, Michael Chabon&#8217;s The Yiddish Policemen Union (which I read a few months back) is being made into a movie by none other than the Coen brothers (whose latest movie, No Country [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doombot &#187; Short Book Review: Gentlemen of the Road</title>
		<link>http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/comment-page-1/#comment-38654</link>
		<dc:creator>doombot &#187; Short Book Review: Gentlemen of the Road</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/#comment-38654</guid>
		<description>[...] may seem like I&#8217;m on a Michael Chabon kick, reading this so soon after The Yiddish Policemen&#8217;s Union, but I knew nothing of this book until I saw it mentioned in Chabon&#8217;s Wikipedia entry. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may seem like I&#8217;m on a Michael Chabon kick, reading this so soon after The Yiddish Policemen&#8217;s Union, but I knew nothing of this book until I saw it mentioned in Chabon&#8217;s Wikipedia entry. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/comment-page-1/#comment-35832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/#comment-35832</guid>
		<description>I think the narrower scope you&#039;re describing is what made me feel like &lt;i&gt;Wonder Boys&lt;/i&gt; was just better written than &lt;i&gt;Kavalier and Clay&lt;/i&gt;. (Or maybe I was just unimpressed that the rest of the country was discovering that comics were neato through prose fiction.) I think I walked away from those books feeling like Chabon probably had a knack for genre fiction, and does a decent job with emotional realism (or whatever you call it), but I wasn&#039;t really impressed by his attempt to overlay them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the narrower scope you&#8217;re describing is what made me feel like <i>Wonder Boys</i> was just better written than <i>Kavalier and Clay</i>. (Or maybe I was just unimpressed that the rest of the country was discovering that comics were neato through prose fiction.) I think I walked away from those books feeling like Chabon probably had a knack for genre fiction, and does a decent job with emotional realism (or whatever you call it), but I wasn&#8217;t really impressed by his attempt to overlay them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/comment-page-1/#comment-35741</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/#comment-35741</guid>
		<description>Interesting that you bring up the homosexual angle. I was reading Chabon&#039;s &lt;a href=&#039;&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia entry&lt;/a&gt; before this, and it said that he &quot;was mistakenly featured in a Newsweek article on up-and-coming gay writers.&quot; But, yes, there is at least one gay character in the book, though it&#039;s more incidental than anything else; most of the sex takes place &quot;offscreen.&quot; 

My recollections of &lt;em&gt;Kavalier and Clay&lt;/em&gt; are dulled by the seven years since I&#039;ve read it. I&#039;ll say this: this book is far less epic in scope than &lt;em&gt;K&amp;C&lt;/em&gt;, which I think makes it feel &lt;em&gt;tighter&lt;/em&gt;. The main action, with the exception of a few flashbacks that fill in details, takes place in about a week. And for me, much of the attraction of the book comes from its hard-boiled roots; I spent much of the earlier part of this year on a Raymond Chandler kick, and Chabon does a good job of channeling him for large parts of the story. I don&#039;t know what, if anything, turned you off about &lt;em&gt;K&amp;C&lt;/em&gt;, so I can&#039;t say for certain that &lt;em&gt;Union&lt;/em&gt; is the better book, but I had a hard time putting it down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that you bring up the homosexual angle. I was reading Chabon&#8217;s <a href='' rel="nofollow">Wikipedia entry</a> before this, and it said that he &#8220;was mistakenly featured in a Newsweek article on up-and-coming gay writers.&#8221; But, yes, there is at least one gay character in the book, though it&#8217;s more incidental than anything else; most of the sex takes place &#8220;offscreen.&#8221; </p>
<p>My recollections of <em>Kavalier and Clay</em> are dulled by the seven years since I&#8217;ve read it. I&#8217;ll say this: this book is far less epic in scope than <em>K&amp;C</em>, which I think makes it feel <em>tighter</em>. The main action, with the exception of a few flashbacks that fill in details, takes place in about a week. And for me, much of the attraction of the book comes from its hard-boiled roots; I spent much of the earlier part of this year on a Raymond Chandler kick, and Chabon does a good job of channeling him for large parts of the story. I don&#8217;t know what, if anything, turned you off about <em>K&amp;C</em>, so I can&#8217;t say for certain that <em>Union</em> is the better book, but I had a hard time putting it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/comment-page-1/#comment-35736</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombot.com/2007/10/20/short-book-review-the-yiddish-policemens-union/#comment-35736</guid>
		<description>But the real question is, did Chabon manage to work in some guy-on-guy action? After &lt;i&gt;Kavalier and Clay&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Wonder Boys&lt;/i&gt;, I was under the impression that was kind of his schtick.

Also: I was not super impressed with &lt;i&gt;Kavalier and Clay&lt;/i&gt;. Would you say this is about as good or better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the real question is, did Chabon manage to work in some guy-on-guy action? After <i>Kavalier and Clay</i> and <i>Wonder Boys</i>, I was under the impression that was kind of his schtick.</p>
<p>Also: I was not super impressed with <i>Kavalier and Clay</i>. Would you say this is about as good or better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

