Jason’s Test for Worthwhile Movies

Any number of factors might come into play in terms of how we judge a movie: pacing, choreography, acting, narrative resolution, etc. But there’s one simple test I’ve been using privately to judge movies by for quite some time now, and I thought it might be time to share it with you. If your media consumption habits are anything like mine, then time you’re watching a movie, try asking yourself this:

Would I rather be playing this movie as a video game?

If so, then it’s something of a failure of a movie, in my mind, as some other medium better capitalizes on the kind of experience it offers. Let me offer a couple of examples of movies which passed and failed this test.

Enemy at the Gates (FAIL). Jude Law is a sniper who is going up against Ed Harris, an enemy sniper. The movie features several extended tension-fraught sniping scenes (which feel like levels), punctuated by a tepid love-triangle plot (which feel like cut scenes). When Law is sitting behind cover and needs to figure out how to distract Harris long enough to escape a trap (solving a puzzle involving a broken mirror), I realize I would rather be playing this as a game. At least then I’d feel more invested in the action scenes, and the perfunctory plot sequences would be bearably short.

Children of Men (PASS). This is one of my favorite movies. It doesn’t lack action or suspense, but the scenes of this kind are so fraught with emotion and a sense of the world’s unfairness that I just got sucked in and wanted to know what happened next. It’s not just action you want to participate in—it’s action you can’t help but watch, where the consequences of actions are tragic and instantaneous. Plus, a large part of the movie is about getting another person to safety, and we all know that (in games) escort missions suck.

Shoot ‘Em Up (FAIL). Extended gun fight! Short narrative explanation describing where to go for the next—gun fight! Repeat until standard ending time. It’s not that this was bad, just that the actual plot and character interaction didn’t even need to be shortened—they were already basically cut scenes. This was a knowing self-parody, admitting that the plot is really just a vehicle to dish up some action. I’m okay with that! But in the end, the action is just shooting guys, for the most part (with bonus carrot attack), and I could’ve done that myself on my Xbox rather than letting Clive Owen have all the fun. Of course, the scene where he has to transition from a sex scene to a fight scene probably wouldn’t escape an Adults Only rating, meaning such a game could never get made. (That clip is NSFW, obviously.)

Wanted (PASS). This kind of reminded me of Shoot ‘Em Up in its absurd presentation and celebration of violence, but the variety of different sorts of craziness just made it hard to picture doing better as a game. In addition to your standard gun fights, you’ve got chase scenes, flipping cars to get a better angle on targets, ruthless mockery of the protagonist, some decent plot twists and turns, exploding rats, and more. I do hear they’re making it into a game, though, which makes me simultaneously hopeful and wary. This one might just work better as a movie.

I look forward to the day when video games are as capable as movies at handling nuanced narratives, and aren’t just (in my opinion and experience) a superior vehicle for generic action scenes. In the meantime, however, I may just go to movies for one thing, and games for another, and each medium now kind of raises the bar for the other.

6 Comments so far
Leave a comment

I’ve been thinking about the same criteria for books:

Pride & Prejudice, much better to read, can’t imagine the game being any good.

Moby Dick, lots and lots of minigames where one must do (and appreciate) the hard work of being a sailer on a whaling vessel. Awesome game.

The Epic of Gilgamesh, why hasn’t this been made into a game yet? Killing evil forest spirits, a great arc of enemy becoming friend, becoming reason for epic journey to land of dead. Someone get me a budget and some programmers!

I honestly can’t tell whether you’re making fun of me (in part because I really would play that Gilgamesh game, or at least the demo). That said, I have definitely read books and thought to myself that the author was writing a movie but just didn’t have the resources to adapt it to the screen him or herself (e.g., some of the later Harry Potter books, and I hear others got that vibe from the Da Vinci Code).

The Da Vinci Code did read like a movie. A very, very poorly written movie. And—surprise!—it was turned into a very poorly written movie. It’s almost shocking.

I wasn’t making fun…I was actually applying the idea to books. I did choose books that I thought were funny/unlikey ideas for games. (Although, I would definitely have dropped quarters into a Epic of Gilgamesh game–I’m rather old school so I think of it as a classic side scroller in an arcade (double dragon sytle?) set in anicent iraq/iran. It could be a really good game.)

As for books versus movies, I never read Da Vinci code, I did read Angel and Demons and decided that I didn’t really need a sequel–I also skipped the movies. But I can sort of understand why someone like the Harry Potter Woman would write with an eye on the movie, if nothing else, the movie version is probably whats going to replace book version in people’s minds. (So structuring the book with the movie in mind would be a real temptation.)

Probably made worse by the face that I just reRead Bendis’s GN about trying to get his other comics made into movies.

[...] The premise is explained with a few lines of text that intro the movie: the year is 2012, stuff is bad, people yearn for new blood sports, thus convicts complete for their freedom in the Death Race. Everything after that is cars racing/shooting/exploding. Because the Death Race is the most popular televised sport of the near-future there are many elements of the sport that are simply explained as a tool for boosting ratings, which works as a great excuse for putting crazy stuff in your movie without worrying about whether it makes sense. A great addition for my overall Death Race experience was the inclusion of the trailer for the next Fast and the Furious movie beforehand (4 Fast 4 Furious?) If you are looking for explosions and cars with machine guns this is a fun movie, though it would likely not fare well on Jason’s “Would this be better as video game” test. [...]

[...] of cinematic progression, and the game is pretty short, but overall, it really raised the bar for Jason’s test for worthwhile movies; seeing a protagonist jump from car to car on a highway while shooting people, for instance, is now [...]



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)