<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short Television Review: Battlestar Galactica</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doombot.com/2009/04/01/short-television-review-battlestar-galactica/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doombot.com/2009/04/01/short-television-review-battlestar-galactica/</link>
	<description>by Jane Austen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://doombot.com/2009/04/01/short-television-review-battlestar-galactica/comment-page-1/#comment-75425</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombot.com/?p=1225#comment-75425</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Having had some time to work up a bit more critical distance to &lt;i&gt;Battlestar Galactica&lt;/i&gt;, I think I could make my short review a lot shorter. This is what I wish I had written:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This show has some interesting political critique and some nice character drama. Unfortunately, it eventually collapses under the weight of its own gaping plot holes, poorly thought-out plot twists, and vapid religious/mystical themes. I can recommend the first two seasons, the beginning &quot;occupation&quot; arc of the third season, and about the first half or so of the series finale, mostly for the rock-em-sock-em robots fight scenes. I&#039;ll remember the series more fondly if I forget the rest of it ever happened.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having had some time to work up a bit more critical distance to <i>Battlestar Galactica</i>, I think I could make my short review a lot shorter. This is what I wish I had written:</p>
<p>This show has some interesting political critique and some nice character drama. Unfortunately, it eventually collapses under the weight of its own gaping plot holes, poorly thought-out plot twists, and vapid religious/mystical themes. I can recommend the first two seasons, the beginning &#8220;occupation&#8221; arc of the third season, and about the first half or so of the series finale, mostly for the rock-em-sock-em robots fight scenes. I&#8217;ll remember the series more fondly if I forget the rest of it ever happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doombot &#187; Television Review Revisited: Life on Mars (US)</title>
		<link>http://doombot.com/2009/04/01/short-television-review-battlestar-galactica/comment-page-1/#comment-74976</link>
		<dc:creator>doombot &#187; Television Review Revisited: Life on Mars (US)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombot.com/?p=1225#comment-74976</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I applaud the creators with letting their imaginations run wild. As with many serial dramas&#8212;Battlestar Galactica comes to mind&#8212;the real interest in Life on Mars turned out to be in its journey, not its [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I applaud the creators with letting their imaginations run wild. As with many serial dramas&mdash;Battlestar Galactica comes to mind&mdash;the real interest in Life on Mars turned out to be in its journey, not its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

